
The employee vs. contractor question largely comes down to control and independence: an employee works under the company's direction as part of its business, while an independent contractor runs their own business and decides how to deliver the work. The IRS, the US Department of Labor and state agencies test the real working relationship rather than the contract label, and a wrong call can mean back taxes, back wages and penalties.
Definition: Worker classification is the legal determination of whether a person who performs services is an employee (covered by payroll taxes, wage laws and benefits rules) or an independent contractor (self-employed and responsible for their own taxes).
Most early startups run on contractors at some point. It's cheap, flexible, and nobody wants to set up payroll for a six-week designer.
The trouble starts when six weeks become eighteen months, the contractor has a company laptop and a standing Monday meeting, and the role looks exactly like a job. By then the label matters far less than how the work happens.
Employee vs. contractor: the core differences
| Factor | Employee | Independent contractor |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Company directs how, when and where work is done | Worker controls methods and schedule |
| Role | Ongoing part of the core business | Defined project or specialized service |
| Pay and taxes | Salary via payroll with tax withholding; Form W-2 | Invoices; pays own taxes; Form 1099-NEC if thresholds apply |
| Benefits and tools | Eligible for benefits; uses company equipment | No company benefits; usually own tools |
Employee example: a full-time software engineer who follows company processes, works on the core product and reports to a manager.
Contractor example: a freelance designer with several clients, hired for a three-month website redesign, who sets their own hours and uses their own software.
The IRS common-law test
For federal employment taxes, the IRS applies the common-law rules and sorts the evidence into three buckets:
- Behavioral control. Does the company control, or have the right to control, what the worker does and how they do it? Detailed instructions, training and evaluation of methods point toward employment.
- Financial control. Does the company control the business side of the work: how the worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who provides tools, and whether the worker can make or lose money?
- Type of relationship. Are there written contracts, employee-style benefits such as insurance or vacation pay, an expectation that the relationship continues indefinitely, and is the work a key part of the company's regular business?
The IRS stresses that no single factor decides. It's a picture, not a checkbox.
If you're unsure, either the business or the worker can file Form SS-8 for an IRS determination, though the IRS says it may take at least six months to get one. Companies that have treated workers as contractors and want to fix it going forward may qualify for the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, applied for on Form 8952. It lets you reclassify workers as employees for future tax periods with partial relief from federal employment taxes.
Separately, Section 530 relief can shield a business from employment tax liability if it had a reasonable basis for contractor treatment, filed all required information returns (such as Form 1099-NEC) consistently, and has not treated similar workers as employees.
Where the DOL independent contractor rule stands in 2026
The Department of Labor uses an "economic reality" test under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which governs minimum wage and overtime. The question is whether the worker is economically dependent on your company or is in business for themselves. The federal position has moved several times:
- 2024 rule. The DOL's 2024 final rule was published on January 10, 2024 and took effect March 11, 2024. It uses six factors weighed under the totality of the circumstances, with no factor given more weight than the others.
- May 2025 enforcement change. On May 1, 2025, the DOL's Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1 told investigators to stop applying the 2024 rule's analysis in enforcement matters and to rely instead on the July 2008 version of Fact Sheet #13 and the reinstated Opinion Letter FLSA2019-6. The 2024 rule itself was not withdrawn: the bulletin says it remains in effect for private litigation, and it notes pending federal lawsuits challenging the rule. The current Fact Sheet #13 on the DOL site (revised March 2024) still tracks the 2024 rule, so it's easy to mistake it for the enforcement standard, which it currently is not.
- 2026 proposed rule. On February 26, 2026, the DOL announced a proposed rule (RIN 1235-AA46) that would rescind the 2024 rule and apply one test under the FLSA, the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. It treats two "core" factors as most important: the nature and degree of the worker's control over the work, and the worker's opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment. Skill, permanence and whether the work is part of an integrated unit are secondary. The 60-day comment period closed on April 28, 2026.
As of September 22, 2026, the DOL's rulemaking page still lists the 2026 rule as a proposal, and no final rule has been published. So the 2024 rule remains on the books (and its legality is still being litigated, per the DOL's Fact Sheet #13) while the DOL declines to apply it in enforcement, and workers can still bring their own FLSA lawsuits under it.
For a five-person company, our suggestion is to treat the federal standard as unsettled, apply the stricter of the federal and state tests, and write down your reasoning for each contractor.
The ABC test in California, Massachusetts and other states
Many states use a stricter standard. California's AB 5 took effect on January 1, 2020 and put the ABC test from the state Supreme Court's Dynamex decision into statute. California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency explains that a worker is an employee unless the hiring company proves all three of the following:
- A. The worker is free from the company's control and direction in performing the work, both under the contract and in fact.
- B. The work is outside the usual course of the company's business.
- C. The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature.
California's EDD notes that some occupations are exempt from the ABC test and fall back to the older Borello multifactor test, so it's worth checking the exemption list before relying on one. Massachusetts applies a similar three-prong test under its independent contractor statute (MGL c. 149, section 148B), and the statute requires all three prongs to be met.
Prong B is the one that tends to catch startups. A software company that engages "contract engineers" to build its core product will likely struggle to show that engineering is outside its usual business. That's a hard case to make with a straight face.
If you hire across states, check the rules where each worker lives, not only where you're incorporated.
"But every startup uses contractors"
Fair, and mostly fine. Contractors are a useful way to get specialist work done without a full-time hire: a designer for a rebrand, a data engineer to stand up a pipeline. An early company often can't commit salaries and benefits to work that may not last.
But the risk isn't using contractors. It's using the word "contractor" for someone who is, in practice, your employee. In our view, the better question is what an auditor would see after watching the role for a month. If the answer is a full-time teammate doing core work on your schedule, we'd put them on payroll.
What misclassification costs: penalties and back pay
Misclassification exposure stacks up across three regimes:
- Federal employment taxes. The IRS says a business that treats an employee as a contractor without a reasonable basis can be liable for the employment taxes on that worker. When the error was not intentional, Internal Revenue Code section 3509 sets reduced rates. The IRS's Internal Revenue Manual puts the total at roughly 10.68 percent of wages if you filed Forms 1099 (1.5 percent for income tax withholding, 20 percent of the employee's FICA share, plus the full employer share), or roughly 13.71 percent if you did not (3 percent and 40 percent). Intentional disregard removes the reduced rates.
- Federal wage law. Under the FLSA, the DOL or the worker can sue for unpaid minimum wage and overtime plus an equal amount as liquidated damages, generally going back two years, or three for willful violations. The DOL's civil money penalty for repeated or willful minimum wage or overtime violations is up to $2,515 per violation, an amount its 2026 adjustment left unchanged from 2025.
- State law. California Labor Code section 226.8 imposes civil penalties of $5,000 to $15,000 per violation for willful misclassification, and $10,000 to $25,000 per violation for a pattern or practice. States also assess unpaid unemployment insurance and workers' compensation premiums.
Illustrative worked example: you paid a full-time "contractor" $100,000 last year and filed a Form 1099-NEC. If the IRS reclassifies the role and section 3509(a) applies, the federal employment tax bill is about $10,680 (10.68 percent), before interest and penalties, and before any state or wage claims. Without the 1099 it is about $13,710.
It also tends to surface in due diligence, where a messy answer about contractors can slow a round. See our list of legal mistakes startups make.
Pay and equity for employees vs. contractors
Employees at early-stage startups usually receive salary, benefits and equity, typically stock options with a four-year vesting schedule. Contractors are usually paid a cash rate per hour or per project, with no benefits.
Contractors can receive equity, but only certain types. Incentive stock options are limited to employees, so contractors and advisors receive non-qualified options or restricted stock. The SEC's Rule 701 exemption for compensatory equity covers consultants and advisors as well as employees. For how advisors are typically paid in equity, see advisory shares, and for employee grants see our equity offer letter template.
An employee vs. contractor checklist for founders
- Is the work part of your core product or service? If yes, lean toward employee.
- Will you set the hours, methods or tools? If yes, lean toward employee.
- Does the worker have other clients, their own business entity and their own equipment?
- Is the engagement defined by a scope, deliverables and an end date?
- Which state does the worker live in, and does it use an ABC test?
- Have you documented IP assignment and confidentiality in either case?
- If in doubt, ask employment counsel before the work starts, not after.
Once a role is clearly an employee position, our guide on hiring your first employee walks through the process, and a startup employee handbook sets the policies they work under. The investor view in startup hiring plans after funding can help you sequence the team, and we've shared our own thinking on hiring your first key employees. Interns are a separate case, and our guide to hiring startup interns covers how to structure and pay them.
Templates
Employee offer letter
[Startup Name Letterhead]\ [Date]
Dear [Candidate Name],
We are pleased to offer you the position of [Job Title] at [Startup Name]. Your employment will begin on [Start Date].
- Compensation: $[Salary] per year, paid [biweekly/semimonthly]
- Benefits: [Health, dental, PTO, etc.]
- Equity: [X,XXX] stock options, subject to Board approval, the equity plan and vesting
- Reporting To: [Manager Name]
- At-Will Employment: This offer does not create a contract of employment for any definite period.
- Confidentiality and IP: Employment is conditioned on signing the Company's confidential information and invention assignment agreement.
Please sign below to indicate your acceptance.
Sincerely,\ [Founder/CEO Name]\ [Title]
Accepted: _____________________ Date: ___________
Independent contractor agreement (summary terms)
[Startup Name Letterhead]\ [Date]
This agreement is between [Startup Name] ("Company") and [Contractor Name or Business] ("Contractor").
- Services: [Describe scope and deliverables]
- Term: [Start Date] to [End Date]
- Compensation: $[Hourly/Project Rate], invoiced [monthly/at milestones]
- Independent Status: Contractor controls the manner and means of the work, may serve other clients, provides their own equipment and is responsible for their own taxes and insurance.
- Confidentiality: Contractor will keep Company information confidential.
- IP Assignment: All work product created under this agreement is assigned to the Company.
- Termination: Either party may terminate with [X] days' notice.
Signed:\ [Founder/CEO Name] _____________________ Date: ___________\ [Contractor Name] _____________________ Date: ___________
A contract helps, but it does not override how the relationship works in practice.
Building your team with support
Who you hire, and on what terms, shapes how fast you sell. 1752vc's Accelerate program invests $100K at a valuation cap of up to $3.5M, is remote, and centers on founder-led sales training, with access to a network of 850+ investors.
The bottom line
Contractors are a good tool for defined, independent work. They're a poor disguise for a job. When a role sits at the core of your product and runs on your schedule, we'd lean toward payroll, and document the call either way.
A contract records what you hoped the relationship would be.
The day-to-day shows what it became.
Key takeaways
- Employees work under the company's control as part of its core business; contractors run independent businesses and control how they work.
- The IRS weighs behavioral control, financial control and the type of relationship, and no single factor decides.
- The DOL stopped applying its 2024 rule in enforcement on May 1, 2025, proposed a two-core-factor replacement on February 26, 2026, and had not finalized it as of September 22, 2026.
- California, Massachusetts and other states use an ABC test that presumes employment unless all three prongs are met.
- Misclassification can mean owing back employment taxes (about 10.68 percent of wages under section 3509(a)), FLSA back pay with liquidated damages, and state penalties of up to $25,000 per violation in California.
- Contractors cannot receive ISOs, but can receive NSOs or restricted stock under Rule 701.
Frequently asked questions
An employee works under the company's direction and control as part of its regular business, and the company withholds payroll taxes. An independent contractor operates their own business, controls how the work is done and pays their own taxes. The IRS, the Department of Labor and state agencies look at how the relationship works in practice, not the contract label.
The IRS uses common-law rules that group evidence into behavioral control, financial control and the type of relationship. No single factor decides; the IRS looks at the whole relationship. A business or worker can request a formal determination on Form SS-8, but the IRS says a determination may take at least six months.
The ABC test, used in California (under AB 5), Massachusetts and several other states, treats a worker as an employee unless the company proves the worker is free from its control, does work outside the usual course of its business, and is independently established in that trade. Those laws require all three prongs to be met and put the burden on the company.
The 2024 rule has not been formally rescinded, but on May 1, 2025 the DOL told investigators to stop applying it in enforcement. On February 26, 2026 the DOL proposed a rule to rescind and replace it, the comment period closed April 28, 2026, and no final rule had been published as of September 22, 2026. The DOL says the 2024 rule still applies in private lawsuits.
Federally, you can owe back employment taxes (reduced rates under section 3509 if the error was not intentional), plus FLSA back wages, an equal amount in liquidated damages, and civil penalties of up to $2,515 per repeated or willful violation. States add their own penalties; California's range from $5,000 to $25,000 per violation for willful misclassification.
Yes. Contractors can receive non-qualified stock options or restricted stock, and the SEC's Rule 701 exemption covers compensatory grants to consultants and advisors as well as employees. Incentive stock options are limited to employees, so a contractor who later joins full time generally needs a new grant to get ISO treatment.
Sources
- IRS: Independent contractor (self-employed) or employee?
- IRS: Internal Revenue Manual 4.23.8, Determining Employment Tax Liability
- US Department of Labor: Notice of Proposed Rule, Employee or Independent Contractor Status (RIN 1235-AA46)
- US Department of Labor: Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2025-1 (May 1, 2025)
- US Department of Labor: Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustments
- California Labor and Workforce Development Agency: ABC Test
- California EDD: Employee or Independent Contractor
- Justia: California Labor Code Section 226.8
Disclaimer: This guide is for general education only and is not legal, tax or investment advice. Laws, market data and program terms change, so it may not reflect the latest developments or fit your situation. Treat it as a starting point, not a source of truth, and talk to a qualified lawyer, accountant or financial adviser before you make decisions.


